Soft Negligence Standards and the Strategic Choice of Firm Size
Juan-José Ganuza and
Fernando Gomez
The Journal of Legal Studies, 2011, vol. 40, issue 2, 439 - 466
Abstract:
In risky activities the extrinsic incentives for care are driven mainly by liability rules and by the asset levels of potential injurers. When the level of assets of the potential injurer is endogenous, we show that softer standards outperform the traditional standards based on first-best behavior, as well as strict liability: firms have incentives to choose to be larger, the lower the standards are. We also show that liability standards should increase in the costs of reducing assets and liability exposure. This means, counterintuitively, that when other instruments that restrict firms' size are relaxed, the optimal response is to relax, and not to tighten, liability standards. Also, in a regulatory competition setting we find that a country lowering its regulatory standards will not attract worse firms in terms of size. On the contrary, the best firms in terms of assets and care will be those benefiting from regulatory competition.
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/660969 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/660969 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/660969
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().