On the Interaction between Legal and Reputational Sanctions

Edward M. Iacobucci

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2014, vol. 43, issue 1, 189 - 207

Abstract: This article shows that reputational sanctions are not, as the literature implicitly assumes, independent of legal penalties. Rather, observers will assess a wrongdoer's type in light of conduct and the expected legal sanctions for that conduct. For example, if a person commits a wrong even in the face of onerous legal penalties, observers will tend to draw a more negative inference about the wrongdoer's propensity for wrongdoing than if legal penalties were light. On the other hand, onerous legal penalties may deter wrongdoing even for actors with a relatively high propensity for wrongdoing, which also affects reputational penalties. In addition, this article demonstrates that the literature's focus on deterrence in considering the relationship between formal and informal penalties is too narrow. It may be socially preferable in some circumstances to adjust legal penalties to allow actors to reveal their types than to adjust legal sanctions to promote optimal deterrence.

Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/675761 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/675761 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/675761

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().