Disgorgement Damages for Accidents

Robert Cooter and Ariel Porat

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2015, vol. 44, issue 2, 249 - 276

Abstract: Under the usual tort rules, damages for an accident equal the victim's loss (compensation). This paper departs from current law by proposing damages equal to the injurer's gain from untaken precaution divided by the probability of liability. Known as disgorgement damages for accidents (DDA), it is the minimum liability necessary to provide injurers with efficient incentives for care. We distinguish three forms of DDA with different information requirements and the same incentive effects. Because DDA is smaller than compensation, it typically induces more activity by injurers and less activity by victims. Calculating DDA generally requires different information than calculating compensation. Consequently, some imperfections in information cause courts to distort incentives for care under compensatory damages and not under DDA, while others have the opposite effect. Furthermore, the smaller disgorgement damages compared with compensation damages can shrink or magnify the distortion in incentives for care caused by courts' and injurers' errors.

Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/684294 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/684294 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/684294

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().