Testing for Repugnance in Economic Transactions: Evidence from Guest Work in the Gulf

Michael Clemens

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2018, vol. 47, issue S1, S5 - S44

Abstract: Despite the large benefits to guest workers from poor countries in rich countries, agencies charged with global poverty reduction do little to facilitate guest work. This may be because guest work is viewed as a repugnant transaction--one whose harmful side effects might cause third parties to discourage it. This paper sets out six criteria for a transaction to be repugnant in consequentialist terms and uses the criteria to formulate several uncommon empirical tests for the repugnance of guest work by Indian construction workers in the United Arab Emirates. It separates the effects of guest work from its correlates using a natural experiment that quasi-exogenously allocates guest work among a group of several thousand job applicants. The effects offer little evidence that guest work in this setting is typically the cause of repugnant consequences.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694615 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694615 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: Testing for Repugnance in Economic Transactions: Evidence from Guest Work in the Gulf (2017)
Working Paper: Testing for Repugnance in Economic Transactions: Evidence from Guest Work in the Gulf (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/694615

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().