EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Preferences for Criminal Justice Error Types: Theory and Evidence

Yehonatan Givati

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2019, vol. 48, issue 2, 307 - 339

Abstract: What shapes individuals’ preferences for criminal justice error types, that is, the preferences for convicting the innocent versus letting the guilty go free? The strong correlation between preferences for criminal justice error types and incarceration rates across countries highlights the importance of these preferences. I develop an instrumental theory and an intrinsic theory of the preferences for criminal justice error types. Using individual-level data from the United States, I find support for both theories. Consistent with the instrumental theory of preferences, gender, race, and concern about crime shape preferences. Consistent with the intrinsic theory of preferences, education and ideology also shape preferences. I confirm these findings using individual-level data from 22 countries and provide some suggestive evidence that culture shapes preferences too.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/704362 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/704362 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/704362

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().

 
Page updated 2021-04-05
Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/704362