An Aggregation Theory of Character Evidence

Hillel J. Bavli

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2022, vol. 51, issue 1, 39 - 62

Abstract: Courts frequently depart from Federal Rule of Evidence 404, which prohibits evidence of a person’s prior acts to prove that the person acted according to a certain character. This leads to verdicts that are unpredictable and based on behavior not at issue in a case. I develop a theory of aggregation evidence, a new concept that draws on principles of estimation and data aggregation in statistics and ties together evidence from a broad range of contexts. I apply this theory to analyze the effects of character evidence on accuracy and to understand why and when courts depart from the rule against character evidence. I show that a type of character evidence that I call objective-chance evidence stands apart from other forms of character evidence in its ability to improve accuracy. I then argue that a formal exception for this type of evidence may lead to a more coherent rule.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/716202 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/716202 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/716202

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().