Migrant-Family Separation and Higher-Order Laws’ Diverging Normative Force

Kevin L. Cope and Charles Crabtree

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2022, vol. 51, issue 2, 403 - 426

Abstract: A growing experimental literature suggests that international law has a larger impact on public opinion than constitutional law. Because the former US policy of separating migrant families at the border arguably runs afoul of both the Constitution and international law, it provides an unusual opportunity to simultaneously explore the normative pull of these norms experimentally. We fielded national surveys in 2018 and 2020, asking respondents how much they supported the policy. We find that telling people that the policy is unconstitutional increases support for the policy, but only when the issue is receiving heavy media coverage, and that international law has no comparable effect on public opinion. We attempt to explain these seemingly counterintuitive results in two ways. First, in studies that explore the impact of constitutional law, respondents may be unsuccessfully treated. Second, constitutional law treatments can trigger a backlash effect through defensive processing of information about constitutionality.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/721617 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/721617 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/721617

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().