Extension: A Tale of Two Studies: Revisiting the Unintended Effects of Staggered Legal Changes

Stéphane Mechoulan, Juan Pantano and Isaac Rosenthal

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2025, vol. 54, issue 2, 519 - 575

Abstract: Post-2003 methodological innovations in causal inference suggest that many older studies investigating the unintended effects of legal changes need reappraisal. In particular, new difference-in-differences estimators have been proposed recently in settings with staggered adoption that allow for treatment effect heterogeneity across groups and dynamic treatment effects that may grow or dissipate over time. These are common to most legal changes occurring at the state level in the United States. We provide a practitioner-oriented overview of those methodological developments, followed by two empirical illustrations. We first revisit a study that finds that abortion legalization led to an increase in sexually transmitted diseases. Second, we revisit an analysis claiming that three-strikes laws caused an increase in homicides. While we find that the conclusions of the second study are robust, we show that some of the conclusions of the first one are sensitive to the new methodological developments.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/733370 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/733370 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/733370

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().