Reducing Sympathy Bias: The Impact of Statutory Interpretation Methods

Ori Katz

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2026, vol. 55, issue 1, 207 - 236

Abstract: This article examines the moderating effect of statutory interpretative methods on sympathy bias in legal decision-making. Previous research has shown that sympathy toward litigants can lead to biased decisions, particularly in cases of legal ambiguity. Two preregistered studies of 300 laypersons and 339 legal practitioners experimentally tested the effect of various interpretative methods on sympathy bias. The results reaffirm the existence of sympathy bias and demonstrate that participants are less swayed by sympathy when instructed to interpret the law by focusing on its plain meaning rather than the legislature’s intention or policy considerations. These findings suggest that a focus on the text of a legal rule can serve as a debiasing technique against sympathy bias. Interestingly, this moderating effect was not mediated by the effect of the interpretative method on the rule’s clarity or the decision’s predictability. The findings contribute to ongoing debates about judicial bias and statutory interpretation. To seek justice is to seek something free of bias. —Aristotle

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735205 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735205 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/735205

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().