Tort Liability: A Minefield for Managed Care?

Patricia Danzon

The Journal of Legal Studies, 1997, vol. 26, issue 2, 491-519

Abstract: The restructuring of health insurance contracts and health care delivery system under managed care is the result of competitive attempts to reduce the inefficiencies that developed in medical markets under traditional indemnity insurance. Liability rules that continue to apply norms of customary care threaten to undermine these potential efficiency gains. Liability rules under managed care should treat claims for denial of coverage as contractual disputes, to be brought against health plans as residual claimants. Where contracts are ambiguous, appropriate coverage should be determined using a cost-benefit criterion based on beneficiaries' willingness-to-pay. Viability claims for negligent care should be permitted only against providers, not against health plans, except where the plan voluntarily assumes liability by contract. Extending liability for negligent care to health plans is likely to distort liability decisions and constrain the competitive evolution of delivery systems. These principles should apply equally to all plans, regardless of their status under the Employer Retirement Income Security Act. Copyright 1997 by the University of Chicago.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/468006 (application/pdf)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:26:y:1997:i:2:p:491-519

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().