Efficiency in Western Water Law: The Development of the California Doctrine, 1850-1911

Mark Kanazawa

The Journal of Legal Studies, 1998, vol. 27, issue 1, 159-85

Abstract: The development of water law in California has been heavily studied by legal historians. Much interest and controversy has surrounded the fact that early on, California adopted a system of water law that recognizes both riparian and appropriative rights and that persists to this day. How well this hybrid system has promoted in economic efficiency use of water in California has been poorly understood. This article examines the early development of California water law to understand how such a hybrid system emerged and how well it promoted economic growth. The key argument is that nineteenth-century California jurists, though constrained by legislative mandates to observe English common law, worked within the confines of that doctrine to mitigate some of its potential inefficiencies. This article provides empirical evidence that those jurists selectively promoted appropriative claims in situations of high transactions costs in order to encourage reallocation of water from existing riparian uses. Copyright 1998 by the University of Chicago.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/468017 (application/pdf)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:27:y:1998:i:1:p:159-85

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division (pubtech@press.uchicago.edu).