The Prestige and Influence of Individual Judges on the U.S. Courts of Appeals

David Klein and Darby Morrisroe

The Journal of Legal Studies, 1999, vol. 28, issue 2, 371-91

Abstract: Judicial scholars have often recognized that prestige seems to vary among judges, but they have not devoted much systematic attention to the phenomenon or its consequences. In this article, we develop a measure of prestige and calculate prestige scores for a sample of 139 federal circuit court judges. We then test the validity of our measure by determining how strongly the scores correlate with other variables, some of which are expected to be related to prestige, others of which should be unrelated. Finally, we incorporate our measure into an analysis of judicial influence, asking whether novel legal rules are more likely to be adopted by other circuits if announced by highly esteemed judges than if announced by less prestigious ones. The evidence suggests that our measure is valid and that prestige can translate into influence. Copyright 1999 by the University of Chicago.

Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/468055 (application/pdf)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:28:y:1999:i:2:p:371-91

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().