On Justifying Cost-Benefit Analysis

Lewis A Kornhauser

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2000, vol. 29, issue 2, 1037-57

Abstract: This essay considers two problems in the justification of cost-benefit analysis. First, it argues that because cost-benefit analysis values policies, variation in imputed "values of life" are not, in theory, cause for concern. Second, it argues that the current framework of justification, which focuses on the moral justification of the formal theory of cost-benefit analysis, is inadequate because it ignores (1) the institutional context in which cost-benefit analyses occur, (2) the comparative nature of the justification, and (3) the fact that justification might be indirect rather than direct. Copyright 2000 by the University of Chicago.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/468104 (application/pdf)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:29:y:2000:i:2:p:1037-57

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().