Commentary of "Hospitalists and the Doctor-Patient Relationship."

Harold C Sox

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2001, vol. 30, issue 2, 607-14

Abstract: The use of the hospitalist is a means to increase the efficiency of hospitals by achieving equal or better outcomes of care while reducing the cost of care. I comment on David Meltzer's controlled study of the costs and outcomes of hospitalist care, which showed increased cost savings and no change in patients' satisfaction with their care. Relative to full-time community practice, Meltzer's findings probably exaggerate the effect of hospitalists on costs. The physicians in charge of the control group of patients were full-time academic faculty, who typically spend 1 or 2 months per year doing inpatient care, in contrast to the hospitalists, who spent most of their time caring for hospitalized patients. His findings probably minimize differences in satisfaction with care. Resident physicians did most of the bedside care for the hospitalist patients and the control group patients, an arrangement that would reduce any intrinsic differences. Copyright 2001 by the University of Chicago.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/324669 (application/pdf)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:30:y:2001:i:2:p:607-14

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().