Response to David Meltzer's Paper "Hospitalists and the Doctor-Patient Relationship."

Robert M Wachter

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2001, vol. 30, issue 2, 615-23

Abstract: The hospitalist movement, in which a generalist physician assumes the physician-of-record role for hospitalized patients in place of the patients' own primary physician, is transforming American hospital care. Studies, including those by David Meltzer, support the premise that hospitalist care is less expensive and possibly of higher quality than inpatient care provided by primary physicians. Meltzer's survey of randomly selected individuals indicates that, although many would prefer that their own physician orchestrate their inpatient care, relatively few would pay more than $100 for this privilege. This indicates that patient dissatisfaction with the hospitalist model is unlikely to impede its widespread implementation. Hospitalists are just the latest example of the ongoing tension between generalism and specialization in American medicine. The hospitalist--unlike most traditional medical specialists--is actually a generalist by nature whose specialty is defined by the site of care rather than by organ, disease, patient population, or procedure. Copyright 2001 by the University of Chicago.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/339296 (application/pdf)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:30:y:2001:i:2:p:615-23

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().