The Condominium versus Cooperative Puzzle: An Empirical Analysis of Housing in New York City

Michael H. Schill, Ioan Voicu and Jonathan Miller

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2007, vol. 36, issue 2, 275-324

Abstract: One of the enduring puzzles of New York City’s housing market is the persistence of cooperatives, despite the prevailing wisdom that condominiums are more valuable. In this article, we examine the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of cooperatives and condominiums and apply these theoretical insights to empirically test whether condominiums have higher valuation. We then use our findings to speculate about why cooperatives remain dominant in New York. In general, theory suggests that the condominium may be a more efficient and desirable housing form, and empirical findings confirm that legal form matters. With one exception, condominiums are more valuable than comparable cooperatives. The exception suggests that, for some owners, the exclusivity that the cooperative offers may be utility maximizing. We speculate that, except for the market segment that seeks exclusivity, the dominance of cooperatives in New York is attributable to transaction costs and collective-action problems that hinder the conversion to condominium form.

Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/519421 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:36:y:2007:p:275-324

DOI: 10.1086/519421

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().