Transnational Forum Shopping as a Trade and Investment Issue

Alan O. Sykes

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2008, vol. 37, issue 2, 339-378

Abstract: Plaintiffs regularly bring cases in U.S. courts seeking damages for harms that have occurred abroad, attracted by higher expected returns than are available in the jurisdiction in which the harm arose. This paper focuses on the potential distortion of trade and investment patterns that can result from implicit discrimination in the applicability of liability rules to producers or investors of different nationalities due to such forum shopping. These distortions are akin to those caused by discriminatory tariff or tax policies and can reduce global economic welfare. In appropriate cases, the welfare costs can be averted by limiting foreign tort plaintiffs to the law and forum of the jurisdiction in which their harm arose, although such a rule is not efficient in all cases. The analysis has implications for a number of areas of legal doctrine, including the doctrine of forum non conveniens, the construction of the Alien Tort Statute, and the rules governing choice of law in transnational tort cases. (c) 2008 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/589664 link to full text (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:37:y:2008:i:2:p:339-378

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().