How Good Are Standard Debt Contracts? Stochastic versus Nonstochastic Monitoring in a Costly State Verification Environment

John H Boyd and Bruce Smith

The Journal of Business, 1994, vol. 67, issue 4, 539-61

Abstract: The authors investigate ex ante efficient contracts in an environment in which implementation is costless. In this environment, standard debt contracts will typically not be optimal. Optimal contracts may involve defaults even in states in which the borrower is fully able to repay. The authors then examine the welfare costs of arbitrarily restricting the set of feasible contracts to standard debt contracts. When model parameters are calibrated to realistic values, the welfare loss from exogenously imposing this restriction is extremely small. Thus, if implementation costs are actually nontrivial (as seems likely), standard debt contracts will be (very close to) optimal. Copyright 1994 by University of Chicago Press.

Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (95)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/296646 full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jnlbus:v:67:y:1994:i:4:p:539-61

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Business from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().