Bank Capital and Portfolio Management: The 1930s "Capital Crunch" and the Scramble to Shed Risk

Charles Calomiris and Berry Wilson
Additional contact information
Berry Wilson: Pace University

The Journal of Business, 2004, vol. 77, issue 3, 421-456

Abstract: We model the trade-off between low-asset risk and low leverage to satisfy preferences for low-risk deposits and apply it to interwar New York City banks. During the 1920s, profitable lending and low costs of raising capital produced increased bank asset risk and increased capital, with no deposit risk change. Differences in the costs of raising equity explain differences in asset risk and capital ratios. In the 1930s, rising deposit default risk led to deposit withdrawals. In response, banks increased riskless assets and cut dividends. Banks with high default risk or high costs of raising equity contracted dividends the most.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (143)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/386525 main text (application/pdf)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: Bank Capital and Portfolio Management: The 1930's Capital Crunch and Scramble to Shed Risk (1998)
Working Paper: Bank capital and portfolio management: the 1930s capital crunch and scramble to shed risk (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jnlbus:v:77:y:2004:i:3:p:421-456

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Business from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().