The Sad Truth about Happiness Scales

Timothy Bond and Kevin Lang

Journal of Political Economy, 2019, vol. 127, issue 4, 1629 - 1640

Abstract: Happiness is reported in ordered intervals (e.g., very, pretty, not too happy). We review and apply standard statistical results to determine when such data permit identification of two groups’ relative average happiness. The necessary conditions for nonparametric identification are strong and unlikely to ever be satisfied. Standard parametric approaches cannot identify this ranking unless the variances are exactly equal. If not, ordered probit findings can be reversed by lognormal transformations. For nine prominent happiness research areas, conditions for nonparametric identification are rejected and standard parametric results are reversed using plausible transformations. Tests for a common reporting function consistently reject.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (176)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/701679 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/701679 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Sad Truth About Happiness Scales (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:doi:10.1086/701679

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().