Are All Economic Hypotheses False?

J Bradford De Long and Kevin Lang
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: James Bradford DeLong ()

Journal of Political Economy, 1992, vol. 100, issue 6, 1257-72

Abstract: The authors develop an estimator that allows them to calculate an upper bound to the fraction of unrejected null hypotheses tested in economics journal articles that are in fact true. Their point estimate is that none of the unrejected nulls in their sample is true. The authors reject the hypothesis that more than one-third are true. They consider three explanations for this finding: that all null hypotheses are mere approximations, that data-mining biases reported standard errors downward, and that journals tend to publish papers that fail to reject their null hypotheses only when the they are likely to be false. Copyright 1992 by University of Chicago Press.

Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (182)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261860 full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers. See http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JPE for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: Are All Economic Hypotheses False?
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:100:y:1992:i:6:p:1257-72

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().