Pareto and Political Economy as a Science: Methodological Revolution and Analytical Advances in Economic Theory in the 1890s

Roberto Marchionatti and Enrico Gambino

Journal of Political Economy, 1997, vol. 105, issue 6, 1322-48

Abstract: It is argued that Joseph Schumpeter's widely accepted judgment that Pareto's work is 'completely rooted in Walras's system' constitutes a misreading of Pareto. In fact, already during the period 1892-1900, Pareto traces the methodological outlines of an economic science profoundly different from that of Walras. It is maintained that his methodological contribution represents an attempt to define the conditions for political economy to be a science. In this context, Pareto examines the theoretical premises of economic theories and questions the hypotheses of perfect foresight and rationality. The ordinalist hypothesis is also shown to be a consequence of these methodological reflections. Copyright 1997 by the University of Chicago.

Date: 1997
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (28)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/516395 full text (application/pdf)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:105:y:1997:i:6:p:1322-48

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division (pubtech@press.uchicago.edu).