Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade?

Curtis Carlson, Dallas Burtraw, Maureen Cropper and Karen Palmer

Journal of Political Economy, 2000, vol. 108, issue 6, 1292-1326

Abstract: Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) established a market for transferable sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission allowances among electric utilities. This market offers firms facing high marginal abatement costs the opportunity to purchase the right to emit SO2 from firms with lower costs, and this is expected to yield cost savings compared to a command-and-control approach to environmental regulation. This paper uses econometrically estimated marginal abatement cost functions for power plants affected by Title IV of the CAAA to evaluate the performance of the SO2 allowance market. Specifically, we investigate whether the much-heralded fall in the cost of abating SO2, compared to original estimates, can be attributed to allowance trading. We demonstrate that, for plants that use low-sulfur coal to reduce SO2 emissions, technical change and the fall in prices of low-sulfur coal have lowered marginal abatement cost curves by over 50 percent since 1985. The flexibility to take advantage of these changes is the main source of cost reductions, rather than trading per se. In the long run, allowance trading may achieve cost savings of $700$800 million per year compared to an "enlightened" command-and-control program characterized by a uniform emission rate standard. The cost savings would be twice as great if the alternative to trading were forced scrubbing. However, a comparison of potential cost savings in 1995 and 1996 with modeled costs of actual emissions suggests that most trading gains were unrealized in the first two years of the program.

Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (213)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/317681 main text (application/pdf)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade? (2000)
Working Paper: Sulfur-Dioxide Control By Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade? (1998)
Working Paper: Sulfur dioxide control by electric utilities: what are the gains from trade? (1998)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:108:y:2000:i:6:p:1292-1326

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().