Why Is Consumption More Log Normal than Income? Gibrat's Law Revisited

Erich Battistin (), Richard Blundell () and Arthur Lewbel

Journal of Political Economy, 2009, vol. 117, issue 6, 1140-1154

Abstract: Significant departures from log normality are observed in income data, in violation of Gibrat's law. We show empirically that the distribution of consumption expenditures across households is, within cohorts, closer to log normal than the distribution of income. We explain this empirical result by showing that the logic of Gibrat's law applies not to total income, but to permanent income and to marginal utility. (c) 2009 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (78)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/648995 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Why is Consumption More Log Normal Than Income? Gibrat's Law Revisited (2007)
Working Paper: Why is consumption more log normal than income? Gibrat's law revisited (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:117:y:2009:i:6:p:1140-1154

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().