Why Is Consumption More Log Normal than Income? Gibrat's Law Revisited
Erich Battistin (),
Richard Blundell and
Arthur Lewbel ()
Journal of Political Economy, 2009, vol. 117, issue 6, 1140-1154
Significant departures from log normality are observed in income data, in violation of Gibrat's law. We show empirically that the distribution of consumption expenditures across households is, within cohorts, closer to log normal than the distribution of income. We explain this empirical result by showing that the logic of Gibrat's law applies not to total income, but to permanent income and to marginal utility. (c) 2009 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (71) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/648995 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Why is Consumption More Log Normal Than Income? Gibrat's Law Revisited (2007)
Working Paper: Why is consumption more log normal than income? Gibrat's law revisited (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:117:y:2009:i:6:p:1140-1154
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().