Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors

Scott Carrell and James West

Journal of Political Economy, 2010, vol. 118, issue 3, 409-432

Abstract: In primary and secondary education, measures of teacher quality are often based on contemporaneous student performance on standardized achievement tests. In the postsecondary environment, scores on student evaluations of professors are typically used to measure teaching quality. We possess unique data that allow us to measure relative student performance in mandatory follow-on classes. We compare metrics that capture these three different notions of instructional quality and present evidence that professors who excel at promoting contemporaneous student achievement teach in ways that improve their student evaluations but harm the follow-on achievement of their students in more advanced classes. (c) 2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (199)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/653808 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:118:y:2010:i:3:p:409-432

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().