Permanent and Transitory Movements in Labor Income: An Explanation for "Excess Smoothness" in Consumption

Danny Quah ()

Journal of Political Economy, 1990, vol. 98, issue 3, 449-75

Abstract: Many have argued that, if labor income is difference stationary, the permanent income hypothesis predicts that consumption should be relatively volatile. In U.S. aggregate data, labor income is well characterized as having a unit root; however, consumption turns out to be relatively smooth. This anomaly is known as Deaton's paradox. The author resolves this paradox by providing decompositions of labor income into permanent and transitory components. They preserve the univariate dynamic properties of labor income. However, when agents distinguish permanent and transitory movements in their labor income, the permanent income hypothesis correctly predicts the observed smoothness in consumption. Copyright 1990 by University of Chicago Press.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (94)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261690 full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers. See http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JPE for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: PERMANENT AND TRANSITORY MOVEMENTS IN LABOR INCOME: AN EXPLANATION FOR "EXCESS SMOOTHNESS" IN CONSUMPTION (1989)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:98:y:1990:i:3:p:449-75

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().