The global governance of FDI and the non-market strategies of TNCs: explaining the “backlash” against bilateral investment treaties

Stephen R. Buzdugan

UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal

Abstract: This article seeks to explain recent decisions by countries to terminate their existing bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and revisit their commitment to future international investment agreements (IIAs). It argues that BITs, transnational corporations (TNCs), host States and international arbitration institutions form a decentralized system of global governance of foreign direct investment (FDI), based on insights from the fields of international political economy and international law, and that the nonmarket strategies of these TNCs have not only shaped the contours of this system but have also prompted host States to reform this system, from the perspective of a “political bargaining model”. The article illustrates this argument through the case of South Africa, which terminated its BITs with several European countries as a response to cases of investor–State dispute settlement (ISDS) and has sought to redefine its engagement with this system of global governance as a result.

Date: 2021-08-31
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-docum ... 021d2a5_en.pdf?repec (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:unc:tncjou:70

Access Statistics for this article

UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal is currently edited by Kumi Endo

More articles in UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kumi Endo ().