Comparing Small Area Techniques for Estimating Poverty Measures: the Case Study of Austria and Spain

Federico Crescenzi, Gianni Betti and Francesca Gagliardi ()
Additional contact information
Federico Crescenzi: Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Siena
Francesca Gagliardi: University of Siena

Economy of region, 2016, vol. 1, issue 2, 396 - 404

Abstract: The Europe 2020 Strategy has formulated key policy objectives or so-called “headline targets†which the European Union as a whole and Member States are individually committed to achieving by 2020. One of the five headline targets is directly related to the key quality aspects of life, namely social inclusion; within these targets, the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Condition (EU-SILC) headline indicators at risk-of-poverty or social exclusion and its components will be included in the budgeting of structural funds, one of the main instruments through which policy targets are attained. For this purpose, Directorate-General Regional Policy of the European Commission is aiming to use sub-national/regional level data (NUTS 2). Starting from this, the focus of the present paper is on the “regional dimension†of well-being. We propose to adopt a methodology based on the Empirical Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (EBLUP) with an extension to the spatial dimension (SEBLUP); moreover, we compare this small area technique with the cumulation method. The application is conducted on the basis of EU-SILC data from Austria and Spain. Results report that, in general, estimates computed with the cumulation method show standard errors which are smaller than those computed with EBLUP or SEBLUP. The gain of pooling SILC data over three years is, therefore, relevant, and may allow researchers to prefer this method.

Keywords: small area estimation; poverty; EU “headline targetsâ€; regional level; NUTS-2; inequality; SEBLUP; cumulation; SILC; Austria; Spain (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C21 C23 I32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2016/June_2016/ERJune2016_396_404.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Comparing small area techniques for estimating poverty measures: the case study of Austria and Spain (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:396-404

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economy of region from Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alexey Naydenov ().