EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Co-Opetition (Coexisting Competition and Competitive Coexistaence) in the Tourism Field in Siberian Regions

Olga Kuznetsova (), Arina Kuzmenko () and Egor Yumaev ()
Additional contact information
Olga Kuznetsova: Omsk State Technical University
Arina Kuzmenko: OSTU
Egor Yumaev: Omsk State Technical University, The State, Municipal Management and Customs Department

Economy of region, 2017, vol. 1, issue 1, 237 - 248

Abstract: The relevance of the topic is due to the need to use of such category as “co-opetition†by public and local government authorities when implementing their powers in the tourism sphere. We divide the term “co-opetition†into two categories: “coexisting competition†and “competitive coexistence†. The problem field of the study is that in the conditions of crisis development, it is difficult to choose and implement new measures and approaches aimed at improving the economic situation in Russia and its regions, diversify the economy. In modern conditions, it is important and effective to develop domestic tourism and incoming tourism in Russia as well as its effective functioning. Russia has considerable natural and ecological, cultural and historical resources. However, the imperfection of the authorities operation and a mechanism of combined implementation of projects by different territories prevent the transformation of tourism industry into the economic powerhouse. In this regard, on the example of Siberian regions, we offer to the authorities to use co-opetition (in both of its meanings) in the combined development of tourism and to establish on this basis the tourist mega-cluster “Fairy Siberia†. The study of foreign experience has allowed revealing the positions, in which Russia falls behind other countries-leaders in the tourism industry. The proposed approach is promising, and it is based on joint efforts of regions and saving money due to the economies of scale. At the same time, it allows the regions to develop their competitive advantages. The practical significance of the received results consists in the possibility of their use by the public and local authorities in the implementation of effective policy for the development of tourism industry.

Keywords: region; tourism; coexisting competition; competitive coexistence; cooperation; competition; cluster; Siberia; import substitution; tourist infrastructure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2017/March_2017/ERMarch2017_237_248.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:237-248

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economy of region from Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alexey Naydenov ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:237-248