Foreign Trade and Regional Inequality:The Case of the Russian Federation
Kazuhiro Kumo (),
Irina Korgun and
Additional contact information
Kazuhiro Kumo: Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University
Alexandra Koval: St. Petersburg State University
Irina Korgun: The Institute of Russian Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Economy of region, 2018, vol. 1, issue 3, 884 - 895
An impact of foreign trade on national inequality levels is one of the most discussed topics both by public, politicians and academics. This paper contributes to this discussion by focusing on the role of foreign trade in the Russian Federation during its rapid economic transformation in 1990â€“2010. During this period, the trade-led growth model has helped to raise country-average levels of income. But simultaneously, it seemingly triggered greater inequality in income appropriation between different social groups. Looking into causality between foreign trade and this observed income disparity from the regional perspective will help us to understand the poverty problem associated with income inequality better and enhance the effectiveness of policies of the Russian government targeting income re-distribution. In particular, this research aims to answer a question whether during 1990â€™sâ€“2000â€™s increasing openness to foreign trade was pro-poor on the regional level or not. Another point of interest is whether the distributional impact of growing foreign trade on incomes in Russian regions had been positive or negative. Several hypotheses for the Russian Federation are tested in the paper. First, higher openness to foreign trade improved income distribution in the Russian regions. Second, globalization of regions as a result of a more active foreign trade benefited individuals in the middle-income decile. This follows an idea that trade liberalization cuts living costs and raises living standards. Third, regions with larger rural population will tend to have more uneven income distribution. This follows from the neo-classical assumption that in rural areas a poverty burden tends to be larger. Active involvement in the trade of agricultural products might improve income distribution in such regions. Additionally, the share of dependent population among households must affect poverty headcount or the depth of poverty as previous studies on poverty determinants naturally suggested.
Keywords: poverty; inequality; foreign trade; trade openness; regional economy; gross regional product; income distribution; Russia; economic transformation; economic development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R11 F16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2018/Septe ... mber2018_884_895.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2018:i:3:p:884-895
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Economy of region from Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alexey Naydenov ().