Essays in Social Experimentation: What Experiments are Needed for Manpower Policy?

Anders Bjorklund

Journal of Human Resources, 1988, vol. 23, issue 2, 267-277

Abstract: Experiments, where prospective participants are randomly assigned into experimental and control groups, are often regarded as the ideal approach to evaluation of manpower policies. This examination shows that such experimental designs can yield misleading and incomplete information about program impacts in cases where program effects vary among individuals. When individual heterogeneity is present, such designs at best provide unbiased estimates of average program effects, not of marginal effects. The latter are often more important for policy than the former. This paper proposes alternative experimental designs that permit estimation of the marginal as well as average program impacts.

Date: 1988
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/145779
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:23:y:1988:i:2:p:267-277

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().