The Crowding Hypothesis and Comparable Worth

Elaine Sorensen

Journal of Human Resources, 1990, vol. 25, issue 1, 55-89

Abstract: Although women's pay and occupational distribution have improved during the past few years, it is still true that women earn considerably less than men and that their occupational distribution is substantially different. Because progress has been slow toward equality in the labor market, some have called for a comparable worth policy. Proponents of this approach argue that occupational segregation contributes to the earnings disparity between women and men. One theoretical justification for this position is the crowding hypothesis. This paper first explains this theory and presents a method used to test its principal hypothesis. It then describes an extension of this design for estimating the phenomenon that comparable worth policies address. Empirical studies conducted in this area are viewed and new findings are presented. Finally, limitations of this analysis are discussed.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (74)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/145727
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:25:y:1990:i:1:p:55-89

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().