Alternative Assessments of the Performance of Schools: Measurement of State Variations in Achievement

Eric Hanushek and Lori Taylor

Journal of Human Resources, 1990, vol. 25, issue 2, 179-201

Abstract: Evaluation of the efficacy of school policies requires measures of student performance across schools and states, but conventional approaches to constructing the relevant data can be very misleading. This paper develops an approach to estimating marginal school effects at the state level. It then documents and estimates the magnitude of biases introduced by commonly employed estimators of school quality. Direct estimates of achievement growth, or value-added, are shown to be far superior to any alternative correction that is commonly employed. Especially at the state level, nonrepresentative data such as aggregate SAT scores provide very biased measures of school quality differences-even when statistical adjustments for demographic differences and varying participation rates are employed.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (53)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/145753
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:25:y:1990:i:2:p:179-201

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().