Intra-Household Resource Allocation: An Inferential Approach

Duncan Thomas

Journal of Human Resources, 1990, vol. 25, issue 4, 635-664

Abstract: If household income is pooled and then allocated to maximize welfare then income under the control of mothers and fathers should have the same impact on demand. With survey data on family health and nutrition in Brazil, the equality of parental income effects is rejected. Unearned income in the hands of a mother has a bigger effect on her family's health than income under the control of a father; for child survival probabilities the effect is almost twenty times bigger. The common preference (or neoclassical) model of the household is rejected. If unearned income is measured with error and income is pooled then the ratio of maternal to paternal income effects should be the same; equality of the ratios cannot be rejected. There is also evidence for gender preference: mothers prefer to devote resources to improving the nutritional status of their daughters, fathers to sons.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (872)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/145670
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
Working Paper: INTRA-HOUSEHOLD RESOURCE ALLOCATION: AN INFERENTIAL APPROACH (1989)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:25:y:1990:i:4:p:635-664

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().