The Economic Reality of the Beauty Myth

Susan Averett () and Sanders Korenman

Journal of Human Resources, 1996, vol. 31, issue 2, 304-330

Abstract: We investigate income, marital status, and hourly pay differentials by body mass (kg/m 2 ) in a sample of 23- to 31-year-olds drawn from the 1988 NLSY. Obese women have lower family incomes than women whose weight-for-height is in the "recommended" range. Results for men are weaker and mixed. We find similar results when we compare same-sex siblings in order to control for family background (for example, social class) differences. Differences in economic status by body mass for women increase markedly when we use an earlier weight measure or restrict the sample to persons who were single and childless when the early weight was reported. There is some evidence of labor market discrimination against obese women. Differences in marriage probabilities and spouse's earnings, however, account for 50 to 95 percent of their lower economic status. There is little evidence that obese African American women suffer an economic penalty relative to other African American women.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (239)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/146065
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Economic Reality of the Beauty Myth (1993)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:31:y:1996:i:2:p:304-330

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().