Psychiatric Hospital Ownership and Performance: Do Nonprofit Organizations Offer Advantages in Markets Characterized by Asymmetric Information?

Tami L. Mark

Journal of Human Resources, 1996, vol. 31, issue 3, 631-649

Abstract: Nonprofit organizations have been hypothesized as being preferable to for-profit organizations in markets characterized by asymmetric information, such as the market for mental health care services. This paper empirically examines whether ownership affects the quality of private psychiatric hospital care. A quality deviation function and a frontier cost function are specified and estimated using data on psychiatric hospitals in California for the years 1984-1989. The results suggest that nonprofit hospitals may provide protection against asymmetric information relative to their for-profit counterparts. No difference in efficiency was found by ownership.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/146269
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:31:y:1996:i:3:p:631-649

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().