Lone Female Headship and Welfare Policy in Canada

Martin D. Dooley, Stéphane Gascon, Pierre Lefebvre and Philip Merrigan

Journal of Human Resources, 2000, vol. 35, issue 3, 587-602

Abstract: The principal qualifying condition for welfare in Canada, unlike the United States, is financial need-there are no demographic criteria. We use a time-series of annual, national cross-sections for the period 1981 through 1993 to estimate a model of lone-female headship. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that welfare benefit levels for one-parent and two-parent families are important determinants of the likelihood that a Canadian woman is a lone mother. In all models with provincial fixed effects, the coefficients for welfare benefits are small, statistically insignificant, and often of the unexpected sign. We do find that the probability that a woman is a lone mother is generally associated in the expected fashion with her earnings capacity and the earnings capacity of her potential male partner, and with her age and schooling.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/146394
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
Working Paper: Lone Female Headship and Welfare Policy in Canada (1999)
Working Paper: Lone Female Headship and Welfare Policy in Canada (1998)
Working Paper: Lone Female Headship and Welfare Policy in Canada
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:35:y:2000:i:3:p:587-602

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (gunnison@wisc.edu).