Unemployment Duration Competing and Defective Risks
John Addison () and
Journal of Human Resources, 2003, vol. 38, issue 1
This paper examines the determinants of unemployment duration in a competing risks framework with two destination states: inactivity and employment. The innovation is the recognition of defective risks. A polynomial hazard function is used to differentiate between two possible sources of infinite durations. The first is produced by a random process of unlucky draws, the second by workers rejecting a destination state. The evidence favors the mover-stayer model over the search model. Refinement of the former approach, using a more flexible baseline hazard function, produces a robust and more convincing explanation for positive and zero transition rates out of unemployment.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (35) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
Working Paper: Unemployment Duration: Competing and Defective Risks (2001)
Working Paper: Unemployment Duration: Competing and Defective Risks (2000)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:38:y:2003:i:1:p156-191
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().