Does Menstruation Explain Gender Gaps in Work Absenteeism?
Mariesa A. Herrmann and
Jonah E. Rockoff
Journal of Human Resources, 2012, vol. 47, issue 2
Ichino and Moretti (2009) find that menstruation may contribute to gender gaps in absenteeism and earnings, based on evidence that absences of young female Italian bank employees follow a 28-day cycle. We find this evidence is not robust to the correction of coding errors or small changes in specification, and we find no evidence of increased female absenteeism on 28-day cycles in data on school teachers. We show that five day work weeks can cause misleading group differences in absence hazards at multiples of seven, including 28 days, and illustrate this problem by comparing absence patterns of younger males to older males.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:46:y:2012:ii:1:p:493-508
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().