Do Religious Proscriptions Matter?: Evidence from a Theory-Based Test

Daniel Hungerman

Journal of Human Resources, 2014, vol. 49, issue 4, 1053-1093

Abstract: A large literature shows that religious participation is associated with various behaviors and outcomes, but researchers lack an accepted instrument for religion and have struggled to establish whether these associations are causal. Using the canonical economic model of religiosity, I develop an empirical test to investigate the importance of religious participation, in particular religious proscriptions and rules, on determining behavior. The test relies on exogenous variation in the cost of secular activities rather than an instrument for religious participation. Several empirical applications of this test are conducted; the results indicate a strong role for religious proscriptions in determining behavior.

Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
http://jhr.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/49/4/1053
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
Working Paper: Do Religious Proscriptions Matter? Evidence from a Theory-Based Test (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:49:y:2014:i:4:p:1053-1093

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().