Child Schooling and Child Work in the Presence of a Partial Education Subsidy
Jacobus de Hoop,
Eeshani Kandpal and
Furio Rosati ()
Journal of Human Resources, 2019, vol. 54, issue 2, 503-531
Could a partial subsidy for child education increase child labor? Using data from the randomized evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program (CCT) in the Philippines, we find that children who were neither in school nor work in the absence of the program not only increased school participation but also increased work for pay. We show suggestive evidence that because the cash transfer only provided a partial schooling subsidy children worked to cover the shortfall in schooling fees. Our findings contribute to the increasing evidence that the design of CCTs, in this case transfer size, matters considerably in terms of achieving program goals.
JEL-codes: C93 I21 J22 O22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.3368/jhr.54.2.0317.8627R1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
Working Paper: Child Schooling and Child Work in the Presence of a Partial Education Subsidy (2017)
Working Paper: Child schooling and child work in the presence of a partial education subsidy (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:54:y:2019:i:2:p:503-531
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().