Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good?

Thomas C. Brown, Patricia A. Champ, Richard C. Bishop and Daniel W. McCollum

Land Economics, 1996, vol. 72, issue 2, 152-166

Abstract: Several contingent valuation studies have found that the open-ended format yields lower estimates of willingness to pay (WTP) than does the closed-ended, or dichotomous choice, format. In this study, WTP for a public environmental good was estimated under four conditions: actual payment in response to open-ended and closed-ended requests, and hypothetical payment in response to open-ended and closed-ended requests. The experimental results, showing that the response format mattered far more for hypothetical than for actual payments, support conclusions about the reasons that the dichotomous choice format yields larger estimates of hypothetical WTP, conclusions that hinge on the hypothetical nature of contingent valuation.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (170)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3146963
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:landec:v:72:y:1996:i:2:p:152-166

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Land Economics from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().