How to Decide When Experts Disagree: Uncertainty-Based Choice Rules in Environmental Policy

Richard Woodward and Richard C. Bishop

Land Economics, 1997, vol. 73, issue 4, 492-507

Abstract: Environmental economists have traditionally addressed the issue of choice under uncertainty by applying the expected utility hypothesis. When policymakers face a panel of experts with widely divergent beliefs, the problem may more accurately be described as a case of choice under pure uncertainty. Arrow and Hurwicz (1972) demonstrate that rational choice criteria under pure uncertainty will focus on the extremes of the state space, not the midpoint as is typically assumed. Using Nordhaus's DICE model, uncertainty-based choices about global warming policies are evaluated. Linkages to the safe minimum standard and the precautionary principle are also discussed.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (54)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3147241
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:landec:v:73:y:1997:i:4:p:492-507

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Land Economics from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().