Differences between Willingness-to-Pay Estimates from Open-Ended and Discrete-Choice Contingent Valuation Methods: The Effects of Heteroscedasticity

Bente Halvorsen and Kjartan Sœlensminde

Land Economics, 1998, vol. 74, issue 2, 262-282

Abstract: Most comparative studies find that the discrete-choice contingent valuation method (DC-CVM) yields higher willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates than the open-ended (OE) format. In this paper, we discuss and test several hypotheses to explain why WTP estimates from OE and DC-CVM questions differ. We find that WTP estimates from discrete-choice data are very sensitive to assumptions made about the random utility. In particular, violation of the homoscedasticity assumption may lead to biased WTP estimates if the error terms are correlated with the cost. This violation was a main source of difference in WTP estimates in our studies.

JEL-codes: Q26 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3147055
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:landec:v:74:y:1998:i:2:p:262-282

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Land Economics from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().