Farmland Retention Techniques: Property Rights Implications and Comparative Evaluation
Joshua Duke and
Lori Lynch ()
Land Economics, 2006, vol. 82, issue 2, 189-213
A conceptual framework distinguishes farmland retention institutions and with a survey of various literatures, interviews, and original policy design, classifies 28 techniques in four types: regulatory, incentive-based, governmental-participatory, and hybrid. The analysis reveals that techniques often perceived to be incentive-based, such as PDR/PACE and TDR, are better understood as participatory and hybrid techniques, respectively. Likely fiscal impacts, stakeholder acceptability, and implementation challenges are assessed. The framework suggests that when governments select multiple techniques, attention should be paid to the implied allocation of property rights to maintain coherent land-use policy and minimize property rights conflicts.
JEL-codes: Q15 Q24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:landec:v:82:y:2006:i:2:p:189-213
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Land Economics from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().