Western Public Lands and the Fiscal Implications of a Transfer to States

Paul Jakus, Jan E. Stambro, Michael Hogue, John Downen, Levi Pace and Therese C. Grijalva

Land Economics, 2017, vol. 93, issue 3, 371-389

Abstract: Federal land management has always been contentious, but recent years have seen a rise in legislative activity demanding transfer of federal land to state control. Can states afford to assume land management without increasing taxes or other revenue enhancement actions? We find that (1) on average, federal lands are not likely to be as economically productive as private lands, (2) states are likely to have management costs equivalent to federal agencies, and (3) states can cover land management costs with land-based revenues if they have access to fossil fuels and timber resources, and prices for these commodities are relatively high.

JEL-codes: R14 R52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
Note: DOI: 10.3368/le.93.3.371
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://le.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/93/3/371
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:landec:v:93:y:2017:i:3:p:371-389

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Land Economics from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().