Incorporating Stated Consequentiality Questions in Stated Preference Research

Patrick Lloyd-Smith, Wiktor Adamowicz and Diane Dupont

Land Economics, 2019, vol. 95, issue 3, 293-306

Abstract: Although consequentiality has transformed the focus of stated preference research, there are concerns with including elicited consequentiality perceptions in econometric models. We test the effect of varying the order of the valuation and consequentiality questions using data from a drinking water reliability survey. We find that this ordering has a substantial impact on consequentiality perceptions. We address the potential endogeneity of consequentiality perceptions and find that they do not have a significant impact on voting. These results provide caution on the use of consequentiality questions and suggest these questions may not be a panacea for stated preference validity issues.

JEL-codes: Q25 Q51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
Note: DOI: 10.3368/le.95.3.293
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
http://le.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/95/3/293
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:landec:v:95:y:2019:i:3:p:293-306

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Land Economics from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().