Federal Funding and State Wildlife Conservation

Dean Lueck and Dominic P. Parker

Land Economics, 2022, vol. 98, issue 3, 461-477

Abstract: Federal aid programs subsidize local governments in sectors ranging from health care to transportation, but there is little empirical study of their effects on local provision. We examine the effects of the 1937 Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act, which directed federal excise taxes on guns and hunting equipment to wildlife agencies on the condition that receiving states stop diverting license funds to purposes unrelated to wildlife conservation. Using panel data from 1925 to 1937, we find that states with larger administrative sectors were more apt to divert wildlife revenues, and these diversions correlate with fewer licenses sold, suggesting adverse effects of diversions on wildlife conservation. Data from 1938–2018 suggest the Pittman-Robertson Act increased license sales and revenue, leading to positive effects on long-run conservation.

JEL-codes: H71 Q28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
Note: DOI: 10.3368/le.98.3.082721-0100
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://le.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/98/3/461
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:landec:v:98:y:2022:i:3:p:461-477

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Land Economics from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().