Internal ministerial advisory bodies: An attempt to transform governing in the Slovak Republic

Sedlačko Michal () and Staroňová Katarína
Additional contact information
Sedlačko Michal: Competence Centre for Administrative Sciences, University of Applied Science FH Campus Wien, Vienna, AT.
Staroňová Katarína: Institute of Public Policy, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, SK

Central European Journal of Public Policy, 2018, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-16

Abstract: In the Slovak Republic, a number of internal ministerial advisory bodies, intended to provide high-quality analyses and evidence based policy making for national policy, have been established over the last two years. We have studied how the rational technocratic model of scientific policy advice as a specific mode of governing, acted out through these new institutional sites of expertise, survives in a highly politicised environment of the Slovak public administration. Central to our study was the reconstruction of an intersubjective account central to the work of organising on which the analytical centres and their staff, as well as their patrons, participate. Complementary to this, we focused on intersubjectively shared elements of the analysts’ community and subculture within the dominant CEE public administration culture. The vision of governing with expertise shared by analytical centres rests on the principles of transparency, orientation on professional merit (primarily econometric, analytical skills), voluntarism, conflict avoidance, political opportunism and institutional autonomy. Analytical centres identify themselves as a distinct professional group – in fact, they form a distinct organisational subculture around traits such as demographic characteristics (predominantly young males with economic or mathematical/IT background), symbols, hierarchies, working culture, humour, as well as artefacts. Analysts see their mission in the provision of impartial, objective analytical evidence for informed decision making, yet they negotiate the boundary between politics and expertise on a daily basis, and, as we found, in numerous aspects of analysts’ work politics cannot be entirely bracketed.

Keywords: scientific policy advice; advisory bodies; evidence-based policy making; accounts of practice; civil service; Central and Eastern Europe (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2018-0004 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:cejopp:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:1-16:n:4

DOI: 10.2478/cejpp-2018-0004

Access Statistics for this article

Central European Journal of Public Policy is currently edited by Martin Nekola

More articles in Central European Journal of Public Policy from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().