When social policy walks into the justice system

Dombrovszky Borbála () and Hoffman István ()
Additional contact information
Dombrovszky Borbála: Eötvös Loránd University (Budapest), Faculty of Law, H-1053 Budapest, Egyetem tér 1-3. (Hungary)
Hoffman István: Eötvös Loránd University (Budapest), Faculty of Law, H-1053 Budapest, Egyetem tér 1-3, Hungary; HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences (Budapest), Institute for Legal Studies, H-1097 Budapest, Tóth Kálmán u. 4, Hungary & Maria Curie Skłodowska University in Lublin, Faculty of Law and Administration, plac Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej 5, 20-400 Lublin, Poland

Central European Journal of Public Policy, 2023, vol. 17, issue 2, 1-12

Abstract: This paper aims to elaborate on the dilemmas Hungarian courts face when they appear in the forefront of policy implementation. Firstly, what kind of (legal) sources and documents should the court involve in in its legal interpretation? Secondly, what are the trade-offs between offering effective remedy sanctions and respecting the differences between branches of law and the division of power? For purpose of this analysis, we turn to the example of school segregation lawsuits between 2007 and 2022. In terms of equal and equitable education, the regulatory frameworks in the CEE Countries are harmonized to the EU standards and are strongly based on the anti-discrimination approach. In theory, policy programs and documents could be used as a source of facts, as well as a source of information regarding legislative goals and policy context. In theory, courts should aim to opt for sanctions with the most potential to achieve effective remedy. If this leads to specific policy-type sanctions, within the bounds of the parties’ actions courts should be able to decide so. However, courts tend to refrain from such sources and decisions. In the context of democratic backsliding the possibilities of such activism are somewhat unclear. Issues around the independence of the judiciary, the attitude of the executive branch towards certain social policy issues, and the practice of overwriting by amendment on part of the National Assembly supermajority may discourage courts and judges from policy-sensitive or innovative adjudication of cases with social policy relevance.

Keywords: policymaking; education; public policy; courts; judgement analysis; Hungary (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2023-0013 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:cejopp:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:1-12:n:4

DOI: 10.2478/cejpp-2023-0013

Access Statistics for this article

Central European Journal of Public Policy is currently edited by Martin Nekola

More articles in Central European Journal of Public Policy from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().